DWP awards new benefit assessment contract to controversial provider; charities seek safeguards for disabled people

2 August 2012

DWP awards new benefit assessment contract to controversial provider; charities seek safeguards for disabled people



The Government has awarded a contract worth hundreds of millions of pounds to two private sector companies, ATOS and Capita, to reassess disabled people for a disability benefit they need to help with the essential higher costs of living (Personal Independence Payment, or PIP).

ATOS already conducts face to face assessments for people accessing Employment and Support Allowance (the benefit for disabled people out of work), but continues to draw intense criticism due to the high rate of inaccurate decisions, successful appeal rates (40%) and waste of restricted resources. Appeals to ESA decisions cost over £26 million in 2010/11.   

The Disability Benefits Consortium (DBC [1]), a coalition of charities representing hundreds of thousands of disabled people, is concerned that many disabled people will be stressed and fearful of the new process – as well as mistrustful given the overarching policy aim of reducing expenditure. DWP plans show that 500,000 fewer disabled people will be eligible for support [2].

The consortium is calling on ATOS and Capita to learn lessons from the Work Capability Assessment, used to assess people for ESA since 2008, and sign up to ten pledges that will help alleviate concerns, establish a greater trust in the new system and deliver a process that is as fair as possible under Government plans [3].

PIP is being introduced as the Government abolishes Disability Living Allowance (DLA) which was introduced from 1992 to help disabled people with essential higher living costs. The change affects working age disabled people (16-64 years of age) from April 2013 [4].

Hayley Jordan, of the MS Society and co-chair of the DBC policy group, says:

"PIP will be a lifeline for disabled people and it is essential that this difficult process is managed well. We urge contractors to learn lessons from previous experiences and sign up to our proposed pledges to demonstrate a commitment to making the process as fair as it can be. Failure will result in tragedy and devastate the lives of disabled people."

Tom Pollard, of Mind, and co-chair of the DBC policy group, says:

"It is essential that every penny reaches the disabled people who are supposed to be accessing support and doesn't get wasted on repetitive bureaucracy or avoidable appeals. It’s now more important than ever before that lessons are learnt and that the process is as fair and as transparent as it can be. The DWP must ensure all contractors meet high standards and that disabled people's anxieties and fears of losing support are not heightened by procedural problems caused by any contractor."

Notes

[1] The DBC is a national coalition of over 50 different charities and other organisations committed to working towards a fair benefits system. Using our combined knowledge, experience and direct contact with disabled individuals and carers, we seek to ensure Government policy reflects and meets the needs of all disabled people. For further info/to view our members please see: http://disabilitybenefitsconsortium.wordpress.com/
 
[2] DWP estimate, January 2012.

[3] The 10 pledges proposed by the DBC are:

1.    We will make sure that a full range of communications methods are available, that our staff are trained in how to use them, and that individuals only have to tell us once what their accessibility and/or communications requirements are.
2.    We will proactively gather all relevant written evidence, and will only call claimants in for a face to face assessment when a decision cannot be reached on the basis of written evidence.
3.    We will only reassess claimants when a change in circumstances is likely, to ensure that claimants are not reassessed inappropriately frequently.
4.    We will ensure that the assessment venue is accessible and appropriate for a full range of disabled people, that claimants are informed of their right to a home visit and aware they can bring a friend, family member, or advocate to their assessment.
5.    We will train our assessors to understand a wide range of impairments and conditions, and to recognise the impact of multiple and complex conditions. Where possible we will match claimants with assessors who have the most appropriate expertise.
6.    We will hold assessors to account for their decisions, will have an accessible complaints procedure in place, and will seek claimant feedback to monitor performance.
7.    Our assessors will conduct interviews in a sensitive and culturally appropriate manner, and will explore how individuals complete activities.
8.    Our assessors will share written reports and any observational evidence they record with claimants, providing them with an opportunity to correct any inaccuracies as early as possible.
9.    We will set up procedures to proactively gather feedback on the assessment process from disabled people and their representative organisations, and will be open with the findings from these.
10.    Guidance for assessors will be regularly updated and developed using input from relevant experts, disabled people and their representative organisations.

[4] This policy change is being implemented under the Welfare Reform Act 2012 provisions.